The Toyota 4Runner provides 9.0 cubic feet with its optional third row in use, which isn't likely to even accommodate a big grocery trip. 5 or 6% for the benefit of having an option that NOBODY else offers which by looking on this forum, most folks have found real value by keeping their tray.Įdit, can one get a sliding tray AND 3row seats? If not, all the figures above are out the window. So, out of 88.8, 5.1 or just approx 5.7% of cargo space is lost by having the tray. The problem here is that the US News article says "2 and 3rd row" seats down.well, the decking with a 3 row seat is different then the decking with just the normal 2nd row seats so I am not sure of the correct cubic feet and I do not have the time to keep searching.go figure, the absolute is calling my name. Now below, I have copied and pasted an excerpt from US NEWS (auto section) off the web, which would suggest that with the rear seats DOWN, there is a total of 88.8 cubic feet of total cargo space. of 3 inches height and 40 x 43 length and width.(or visa versa), Which I think works out to about 5.2 cubic feet in used space. Measuring the tray AND the hidden compartment unit, gives us an approx. Just for the sake of clarity and knowing that I am posting this in front of folks who need, want and work with absolutes (and I do not mean Vodka), my figures are NOT exact. Now, let's look at the real (approx) gain of not having it. Think lengthXwidthXdepth of actual cargo tray vs that little compartment.īut, but, but.I like my slide-out tray! Quit picking on it.you mean, mean engineer.LOL Yeah, but those without the slide out tray have much more storage than that little compartment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |